Consent is part of our everyday lives, even if it doesn't seem like it. And it's going through a radical shift in American ideology right now.
Perhaps the most commonly recognized form of publicly acknowledged consent goes like this: A man who recently broke into a flop sweat bends down on one knee and offers a girl a sparkly token. He will now crow about her consent if he receives it. "She said yes!" is plastered all over my social media news. It's a blatant, emotionally thrilling acknowledgment of consent.
Consent is what creates the ebb and flow of our lives as one person interacts with another and they learn how to work together. A company consented to pay me a certain wage at which point I consented to wake up at a set time each day and bring a presentable version of myself to an agreed upon address so I can work with others for a common goal. This is often referred to as a job. It's less well-known as a complex web of collaborative consent or non-consent.
Simple moments of consent escape our notice. We walk into a restaurant and order coffee from a waitress who's consented to work in that place. The waitress asks if we want room for cream and sugar. We answer. Done. Simple moments of consent are easy, really. If a waitress goes directly against your requested way to receive coffee, this is acknowledged as a faux pas. Likely it'll get fixed and everyone can just move on.
Then you have the public, important, and life-changing moments of consent. Let's say a couple has been dating a long time and has discussed getting married. They don't just assume they're married because they got the impression the other person likes the idea of marriage. It's almost like our innocent-until-proven-guilty law: non-consent is acted upon until consent is clearly given. Think about it. The couple continues to spend time together, they love each other, they talk about their future. But until one party asks the other to get married and they both agree, they go on without any change. Shoot, just to start dating, there's a series of questions and affirmative answers. And if one person asks another to enter into a relationship and the other person says no, it is the responsibility of the asking party to back off and respect the wishes of the person who didn't consent. In very important and public things, consent defaults to the lowest acknowledged level of consent and no one moves beyond that unless both parties are in agreement. Except in the case of stalking. And I hope we can all agree that's just not okay.
There's a lot of hype that happens after one person asks the other to agree to get married. And even at that point of mutual consent, they still aren't married. They have to then decide how they will get married. Then the planning starts. Some people have short, sweet engagements, and others plan the wedding of the millennium and take all kinds of time to do so, but in all cases, agreeing to get married isn't even close to the same as being married. After all that mutual consent, part of the wedding ceremony includes asking both people again if they will consent to the marriage. That's a whole lot of consent.
But when we talk about consent in relation to sex, there's a total shift. What does that say about our cultural views of sex?
I have undergone a dramatic shift in thinking on this topic. I recall talking to someone when I was in high school. We were discussing a case at the local university where a girl had become extremely intoxicated and she later accused someone of rape during her time of intoxication. The person I was talking to said it was the girl's fault. She shouldn't have compromised her safety. And I agreed at the time. Looking back now, I can't believe I thought that! I've known too many precious women who've ended up in a situation not knowing whether or not they actually gave consent. It takes a long time for some women to even realize that they were raped. And the reality is, when consent is not given freely, openly, and enthusiastically, the only possible alternative is that rape has occurred. There is no gray area. There is either consent or there isn't. If someone took your cell phone without your permission, you'd know it was stolen. And you'd know whether or not you'd given consent for that person to take it. Sex is no different. But the way we see it is vastly different.
There's confusion about whether rape can occur in a committed relationship or even a marriage. Didn't she consent when she said "I do"? Nope. She agreed to be married.
When it comes to sex, there's this idea that coercion is permissible, even expected. That women have to be convinced, or that women don't necessarily want sex, so it's up to men to wheedle it out of them. I've seen countless articles about 50 Shades of Grey that talk about how romantic it was that Christian Grey knew what Anastasia Steele wanted better than she knew herself. Then there's Disney selling girls a Prince who will save them and change their lives. And soon we have this very entrenched idea that the right Prince Charming will come along for each of us sad women and he'll be able to anticipate our needs. He's somehow supposed to know us better than we know ourselves. And to get to that point, we have to cross a whole lot of really unacceptable boundaries.
The first boundary I notice is a woman's right to her own thoughts. In a previous post, I disclosed that 8 of my formative years were spent in a cult. It's been years since I was involved there, but I'm finding ways that my thought process is still growing up. Now, when I hear someone talk about another person knowing them better than they know themselves, danger signals go off for me. I've had the experience of someone else thinking for me. I won't ever go back to that. It's appalling. When we (ladies) compromise our own right to our thoughts by assuming someone else can know what we want, we let go of some of our own ability to give a meaningful "yes" or "no" answer to anything. And in doing so, we endorse a perceived dumbing down of women. If we're too self-unaware to know our own minds, then why do we think we can be CEOs or raise kids? The ability to give meaningful and intentional consent is critical. And it definitely extends beyond sex. I think the lack of understanding of consent for sex stems from this archetypal role we have for men and women in which no one really wins at all.
The second boundary I see us crossing is for the men. We women often tell men they're supposed to know what we want without us having to tell them. In the hopes that they'll figure us out, we sever communication. And then we're angry (in a passive-aggressive sort of way) if they're closed off. News flash for us all: the only one who knows what's going on in your head is you. So when guys are suddenly expected to tell us what we want, everything goes backward. And we've covered why that doesn't work, but it goes further. It dissolves communication and puts a lot of pressure on a man to "know what women want" all while we pretend to be very confusing. Really, though, people aren't confusing when they communicate openly and when they start by knowing their own minds. It's just as messed up to expect your man to know your thoughts without having to be told as it is to expect that a woman doesn't know her own mind. Good men might be relieved to find women who know themselves and are willing to communicate about themselves and their own thoughts. Then the men are off the hook and don't have to constantly guess what's going on. Consent is vital to men, too.
I used to think that a girl could change her mind and be fickle and it didn't matter. She was basically just not to be taken that seriously in the first place because the one thing you could count on is that she was inconsistent. That's being a woman. And a man had the task of figuring out what his girl wanted or meant at any given time. And by the nature of the setup, he was going to fail just about every time and she was going to be angry and feel undervalued. Thus, men are either buffoons or jerks and women weave webs of confusion. Well, I don't think I like this world of fickle women and buffoon men. Count me out. That way of thinking erodes the pathways for healthy consent and even for good communication.
To make matters more confusing, we flaunt consent for the big things like engagement and marriage, and then we muddy the waters for the things that we don't like to talk about. Most people in this culture don't like to talk about sex. So consent for sex has become anything but simple. It's become a religious thing, a matter of coercion, and no one can delineate rape from anything else. If the guy is supposed to tell the girl what she wants, then how can rape occur? And in my opinion, that's the pathway to victim blaming. As shown above, consent isn't just vital for women. Everybody needs to be on board and everyone benefits. You wouldn't suddenly start a marriage without your partner's consent, right? So don't assume sex is a given. Ever. It's just like anything else. It must be talked about. We have to break down those walls that keep sex a taboo topic.
I love this blog about how consent is like a cup of tea. It boils it down to something that makes sense. Really, if we weren't so afraid to foster actual communication about consent, it would be this simple. Equating consent to offering a cup of tea takes away all of the emotional and cultural baggage from the question. And it works. Since this culture is so afraid of sex and of talking about it, can we at least think of it as a cup of tea. But I think it would be best if we could take the shame out of sex. Instead of unfolding sex in one horribly shocking conversation between a parent and child, why not let sex be an ongoing conversation just like talking about any other aspect of growth in your child? It's just one facet of who we are, but when it's made shameful, it gets really warped and sort of takes over our thought process. A friend gave the example of telling me not to think of the color red. Suddenly, all I could see were all the red things in the room. Let's get sex in its proper place, along with consent. If we can stop over-emphasizing sex and start actually talking about it in a healthy way, consent can be a natural thing for us rather than a befuddling question mark.
Above all, please know your own mind. You're the only one with any right to speak for yourself. So do a good job. Represent yourself in a way that will make you proud of yourself. And talk about consent with your kids. Boys need to know. Protect them so they don't become inadvertent sex offenders. Girls need to know. It'll help them know the difference between a healthy situation or a risky one. Protect your kids and inform them about consent. Don't leave it up to our culture to inform them.
Perhaps the most commonly recognized form of publicly acknowledged consent goes like this: A man who recently broke into a flop sweat bends down on one knee and offers a girl a sparkly token. He will now crow about her consent if he receives it. "She said yes!" is plastered all over my social media news. It's a blatant, emotionally thrilling acknowledgment of consent.
Consent is what creates the ebb and flow of our lives as one person interacts with another and they learn how to work together. A company consented to pay me a certain wage at which point I consented to wake up at a set time each day and bring a presentable version of myself to an agreed upon address so I can work with others for a common goal. This is often referred to as a job. It's less well-known as a complex web of collaborative consent or non-consent.
Simple moments of consent escape our notice. We walk into a restaurant and order coffee from a waitress who's consented to work in that place. The waitress asks if we want room for cream and sugar. We answer. Done. Simple moments of consent are easy, really. If a waitress goes directly against your requested way to receive coffee, this is acknowledged as a faux pas. Likely it'll get fixed and everyone can just move on.
Then you have the public, important, and life-changing moments of consent. Let's say a couple has been dating a long time and has discussed getting married. They don't just assume they're married because they got the impression the other person likes the idea of marriage. It's almost like our innocent-until-proven-guilty law: non-consent is acted upon until consent is clearly given. Think about it. The couple continues to spend time together, they love each other, they talk about their future. But until one party asks the other to get married and they both agree, they go on without any change. Shoot, just to start dating, there's a series of questions and affirmative answers. And if one person asks another to enter into a relationship and the other person says no, it is the responsibility of the asking party to back off and respect the wishes of the person who didn't consent. In very important and public things, consent defaults to the lowest acknowledged level of consent and no one moves beyond that unless both parties are in agreement. Except in the case of stalking. And I hope we can all agree that's just not okay.
There's a lot of hype that happens after one person asks the other to agree to get married. And even at that point of mutual consent, they still aren't married. They have to then decide how they will get married. Then the planning starts. Some people have short, sweet engagements, and others plan the wedding of the millennium and take all kinds of time to do so, but in all cases, agreeing to get married isn't even close to the same as being married. After all that mutual consent, part of the wedding ceremony includes asking both people again if they will consent to the marriage. That's a whole lot of consent.
But when we talk about consent in relation to sex, there's a total shift. What does that say about our cultural views of sex?
I have undergone a dramatic shift in thinking on this topic. I recall talking to someone when I was in high school. We were discussing a case at the local university where a girl had become extremely intoxicated and she later accused someone of rape during her time of intoxication. The person I was talking to said it was the girl's fault. She shouldn't have compromised her safety. And I agreed at the time. Looking back now, I can't believe I thought that! I've known too many precious women who've ended up in a situation not knowing whether or not they actually gave consent. It takes a long time for some women to even realize that they were raped. And the reality is, when consent is not given freely, openly, and enthusiastically, the only possible alternative is that rape has occurred. There is no gray area. There is either consent or there isn't. If someone took your cell phone without your permission, you'd know it was stolen. And you'd know whether or not you'd given consent for that person to take it. Sex is no different. But the way we see it is vastly different.
There's confusion about whether rape can occur in a committed relationship or even a marriage. Didn't she consent when she said "I do"? Nope. She agreed to be married.
When it comes to sex, there's this idea that coercion is permissible, even expected. That women have to be convinced, or that women don't necessarily want sex, so it's up to men to wheedle it out of them. I've seen countless articles about 50 Shades of Grey that talk about how romantic it was that Christian Grey knew what Anastasia Steele wanted better than she knew herself. Then there's Disney selling girls a Prince who will save them and change their lives. And soon we have this very entrenched idea that the right Prince Charming will come along for each of us sad women and he'll be able to anticipate our needs. He's somehow supposed to know us better than we know ourselves. And to get to that point, we have to cross a whole lot of really unacceptable boundaries.
The first boundary I notice is a woman's right to her own thoughts. In a previous post, I disclosed that 8 of my formative years were spent in a cult. It's been years since I was involved there, but I'm finding ways that my thought process is still growing up. Now, when I hear someone talk about another person knowing them better than they know themselves, danger signals go off for me. I've had the experience of someone else thinking for me. I won't ever go back to that. It's appalling. When we (ladies) compromise our own right to our thoughts by assuming someone else can know what we want, we let go of some of our own ability to give a meaningful "yes" or "no" answer to anything. And in doing so, we endorse a perceived dumbing down of women. If we're too self-unaware to know our own minds, then why do we think we can be CEOs or raise kids? The ability to give meaningful and intentional consent is critical. And it definitely extends beyond sex. I think the lack of understanding of consent for sex stems from this archetypal role we have for men and women in which no one really wins at all.
The second boundary I see us crossing is for the men. We women often tell men they're supposed to know what we want without us having to tell them. In the hopes that they'll figure us out, we sever communication. And then we're angry (in a passive-aggressive sort of way) if they're closed off. News flash for us all: the only one who knows what's going on in your head is you. So when guys are suddenly expected to tell us what we want, everything goes backward. And we've covered why that doesn't work, but it goes further. It dissolves communication and puts a lot of pressure on a man to "know what women want" all while we pretend to be very confusing. Really, though, people aren't confusing when they communicate openly and when they start by knowing their own minds. It's just as messed up to expect your man to know your thoughts without having to be told as it is to expect that a woman doesn't know her own mind. Good men might be relieved to find women who know themselves and are willing to communicate about themselves and their own thoughts. Then the men are off the hook and don't have to constantly guess what's going on. Consent is vital to men, too.
I used to think that a girl could change her mind and be fickle and it didn't matter. She was basically just not to be taken that seriously in the first place because the one thing you could count on is that she was inconsistent. That's being a woman. And a man had the task of figuring out what his girl wanted or meant at any given time. And by the nature of the setup, he was going to fail just about every time and she was going to be angry and feel undervalued. Thus, men are either buffoons or jerks and women weave webs of confusion. Well, I don't think I like this world of fickle women and buffoon men. Count me out. That way of thinking erodes the pathways for healthy consent and even for good communication.
To make matters more confusing, we flaunt consent for the big things like engagement and marriage, and then we muddy the waters for the things that we don't like to talk about. Most people in this culture don't like to talk about sex. So consent for sex has become anything but simple. It's become a religious thing, a matter of coercion, and no one can delineate rape from anything else. If the guy is supposed to tell the girl what she wants, then how can rape occur? And in my opinion, that's the pathway to victim blaming. As shown above, consent isn't just vital for women. Everybody needs to be on board and everyone benefits. You wouldn't suddenly start a marriage without your partner's consent, right? So don't assume sex is a given. Ever. It's just like anything else. It must be talked about. We have to break down those walls that keep sex a taboo topic.
I love this blog about how consent is like a cup of tea. It boils it down to something that makes sense. Really, if we weren't so afraid to foster actual communication about consent, it would be this simple. Equating consent to offering a cup of tea takes away all of the emotional and cultural baggage from the question. And it works. Since this culture is so afraid of sex and of talking about it, can we at least think of it as a cup of tea. But I think it would be best if we could take the shame out of sex. Instead of unfolding sex in one horribly shocking conversation between a parent and child, why not let sex be an ongoing conversation just like talking about any other aspect of growth in your child? It's just one facet of who we are, but when it's made shameful, it gets really warped and sort of takes over our thought process. A friend gave the example of telling me not to think of the color red. Suddenly, all I could see were all the red things in the room. Let's get sex in its proper place, along with consent. If we can stop over-emphasizing sex and start actually talking about it in a healthy way, consent can be a natural thing for us rather than a befuddling question mark.
Above all, please know your own mind. You're the only one with any right to speak for yourself. So do a good job. Represent yourself in a way that will make you proud of yourself. And talk about consent with your kids. Boys need to know. Protect them so they don't become inadvertent sex offenders. Girls need to know. It'll help them know the difference between a healthy situation or a risky one. Protect your kids and inform them about consent. Don't leave it up to our culture to inform them.